|
A Painting and a Sculpture
Sally McIntyre
Sydney-based curator Nicholas Chambers is philosophical about the
inclusion of Scottish artist Martin Creed as one of the artists
in A painting and a Sculpture,
an exhibition installed at The Physics Room this month for its 2nd
showing, after a debut late last year at Melbourne project space
200 Gertrude Street. The show, which pairs an established Australian
and an equally well-known international artist in a carefully spare
frame of gallery white, is deliberately small-scaled and tightly
focused, all the way from its title to the positioning of the works:
one small painting in a monochromatic hue of violent chemical orange,
hung directly above one small white sculpture, nestled in a white
corner of the room, on the bare wooden floor. The painting is by
John Nixon, an Australian artist represented in Christchurch by
Jonathan Smart Galleries, who has excluded all colours but orange
from his palette since 1995. The sculpture is the Creed work -
a screwed up piece of paper, which arrived in New Zealand with all
the documents appropriate to an artist of his stature, but in its
exhibited state is incidental to the point that it could easily
be rubbish left behind by a gallery goer. Chambers stresses
Creeds inclusion in the show happened "before the whole
Turner Prize catastrophe" and looks wearily down at the sleeve
of his immaculate Fred Perry raincoat, wanting to leave the whole
issue of art in the mass media behind. His careful curation stresses
almost the opposite stance to the bombast which the Turner Prize
invokes, providing instead a scale of exhibition which invites a
certain intimacy with work which is in itself, small in its focus.
This, Chambers says, is for many reasons, many of them practical,
the rest born out of a theoretical focus on practical issues: The
small-scale exhibition can travel, as it has here, to other countries.
The limits which funding and time circumscribe on exhibitions should
be seriously considered factors in the showing of art work. A massive
scale group show of contemporary art takes time and money to put
together, which no independent art space or curator can afford,
and sometimes sets up a context for work which is both inappropriate
and uninviting for the individual viewer. Contemporary art, in Chambers
view, can also, and perhaps needs to, be seen in a context which
takes signs away from the work in order to preserve its autonomy:
to reveal, rather than conceal it.
The resulting exhibition, for all its subtlety, leaves you with
little to think about, no narrative to ponder. As an exhibition
it is formal, trading solely on the tension between the two works,
between their media, between what is there and what is excluded.
It also casts the viewer in a certain position, inviting them into
a dialogue where there are no signs pointing to what should be thought
or what parameter should be drawn around the two works. In its back-to-basics
openness, it seems didactic, somewhat like a Visual Arts version
of the Dogma 95 film groups manifesto for filmmakers. It also
allows for extended individual pondering: the sculpture is humerous,
and causes reflection upon the nature of the plastic arts, and appears
gestural, energised, as compressed as a knotted forehead. Its pairing
with the vivid orange canvas, which if all colours denote an emotion,
is nothing found in nature, sees the latter become a Rothko-like
meditation on the flat surfaces of our age. The show leaves an intellectual,
graceful, rather robust taste in the mouth, far from the saccharine
candy floss, overdetermination and general weariness that attends
many shows in galleries geared toward a mythical "general public".
A painting and a Sculpture is nothing more, and nothing
less. For his first New Zealand exhibition, Creed has appropriately
slipped in through a back door held open by Chambers, avoiding the
fanfare normally associated with international stars, to do what
he does, which is make work that, whatever the scale, looks like
anyone could do it, and belies any notion of art as
a display of recognisable skill in favour of the simplicity of concept
and its expression in incidental gesture. This is a showing of such
work as though the media furore created by the Turner Prize never
actually happened, which is, perhaps, the only way it is possible
to 'view' such work in the first place. Despite the Institutional
Theory ironies inherent in Creed's practice, which are fun, and
want you to laugh at them (as could be seen during the Physics Room's
exhibition, where two acts of tongue-in-cheek vandalism perpetrated
on the work saw it, firstly, uncrumpled and spread out flat, and
later, surrounded by a hastily crumpled team of identical replicas:
you imagine Martin Creed might have done the same thing himself
while still at Art School), such dis-informative media attention
can only serve to further conceal, obscure and mystify contemporary
art.
'A Painting and A Sculpture', in its deliberate formal promotion
of a stripped-back model in which contemporary art can be adequately
viewed, directly addresses such issues, saying that the solution
to being swamped by information and images in the Age of Mechanical
Reproduction is to focus narrowly on the things that are relevant
- in this case, the actual physical work of art, which is, in all
its nakedness, right there in front of you. It builds an alternate
model for the global dissemination of artworks which does not rely
solely on their presence as Internet images but preserves them in
their full materiality. This can also, if you like, be seen to tap
into wider issues regarding the information society in which we
currently have more information available to us than ever before,
but, paradoxically, most of that traffic is extraneous and it's
constant, high speed barrage can easily cause individuals to become
less discriminatory in their reading, or even to suffer burnout.
Along with the concurrently shown exhibition 'A Painting and A
Photograph', also curated by Chambers for the Physics Room, which
pairs two more emerging artists under the same curatorial model,
the show, additionally, serves to remind that Creed, and other publicly
lauded artists, such as Victoria's Ricky Swallow, are also, fundamentally,
artists who make work, and are, in doing so, merely the tip of the
iceberg of contemporary practice in which hundreds of thousands
of people actively work as artists, focusing on a huge variety of
important formal and narrative issues within their efforts. These
people will continue to make work, as the vast majority of Artists
do, despite having a spate of aphids on their camellias, only having
a BFA (hons) rather than an MFA, and not winning the Turner prize
this year.
This article also appeared in
Presto Magazine
A Painting &
a Sculpture
Presto, Feb, 2002
Sally McIntyre
|