|  
       Avatar 
  David Haines 
  June 28 - July 25 1998 
       
      David Haines is an installation artist who has been practicing 
  for over ten years. Originally trained as a painter his work since 
  the mid eighties has focused on combining time based art forms such 
  as video, sound and computer animation with static objects and images 
  to create a vivid environment. Haines' work is founded on the written 
  word and finding alternatives for experimental prose in forms other 
  than the printed page. Medievalism-musical/non musical kingdoms 
  was a major video work of 1997 involving multi video monitors and 
  projections shown at Artspace, Sydney. For the collection of works 
  Avatar at the Physics room Haines has taken an assemblage 
  approach to present a series of works which are hallucinatory, intense 
  and playful, along with the text of some incongruous ideas.  
   
  "If artists have generated a number of clichés about the body, in 
  light of popular theory, then this work is my take on the body art 
  from hell. I just had to do it... I had to respond to all that nasty 
  body art, with its often implied misery or lack. Most importantly 
  its been fun to take a crazy concept or two and throw them together 
  like a cooking experiment - Liebniezian Sex is a good example. 
  How is it possible to create a concept like Liebniezian Sex that 
  no one's ever heard of before? How can you think about this philosopher 
  of Monads, differential calculus and sex in the same breath? This 
  is when the artwork hopefully becomes a kind of miracle. What is 
  the sexual relationship between monads really like?"  
   
  For Haines, humour is a tool of disruption. His work bristles with 
  texts which can be read as either darkly medieval, ironically bogunesque, 
  or parodic of heightened literature. His play with language makes 
  speech and writing permeable membranes which envelop our everyday 
  lives, but are not impervious to buckles, folds, and punctures. 
  Haines makes his own language, replete with bizarre hybridisations 
  and deliberate misspellings. But these literary landscapes are not 
  just about de-contextualising the every day , they are also purely 
  poetic celebrations of magnificent words.  
   
  Haines has a grand passion for archaic and pompous lingo, and with 
  these tropes he explores the dark and primeval dimension of European 
  culture. Hienrick Loof, a name painted onto stretched canvas, becomes 
  an entity in his own right. Perched precariously over an open hatch 
  in the floor, this board could be an epitaph or a signpost in a 
  moth-eaten museum. Except that whatever is under the floorboards 
  is alive. Hienrick Loof is snoring, continuously. This obsession 
  with the nasal is taken to an extreme in the giant print of the 
  cross-section of a human skull, with the word ORIONSNOTLOCKER engraved 
  over the nasal cavity like a serious medical text. This is Hainespeak 
  in a world where the practical and the imaginary overlap, where 
  language is still improvisatory; in other words, a world without 
  cops where spellcheck has been universally de-installed.  
   
  Arguably, a series of orange paintings (New Dutch National) 
  takes a more oblique stab at the olfactory... the Dutch being renowned 
  as a nation of cheese-chewers, it¹s no wonder Loof's ORIONSNOTLOCKER 
  got blocked. Perhaps, like one of the Indian mystics that Haines' 
  title Avatar conjures up, Loof is engaged in a metaphysical slumber, 
  due to awaken at any moment in any form? Or perhaps, as his Germanic 
  sounding moniker suggests, he is a part of that more recent and 
  dark European history, and he is avoiding persecution in the relative 
  safety of his bunker? Perhaps, it being daytime when he sleeps, 
  Loof is that most European of phantasms, a vampire?  
   
  Whatever the exegesis behind Loof's retreat, the fact remains that 
  he has succumbed to that most basic of animal needs - sleep. Haines 
  is indeed lampooning 'body art' by presenting us with the least 
  abject and most every day aspect of 'living in a body.' Not only 
  that, but Loof's grunts persist in interrupting the viewer in his/her 
  attempt to make a 'serious' reading of the works in Avatar. The 
  very act of gallery-going is reduced to a palpably humdrum chore. 
  If Loof can¹t even stay awake for the duration of the show, why 
  should we?  
   
  Ironically, while Loof is caught on the nod, Haines' variations 
  of a theme in rockin' baroque give us relief from mandatory minimalism 
  and the plainly unfunny, which is more than enough reason to stay 
  awake.  
      Reviews, Essays & Articles 
       Invisable presence taunts 
      imagination The Press, 1998 
      July 15, p. 18 
      Lorimer, Wayne.  
      Avatar, by David Haines and Thin Connections, by Kevin Sheehan
       
   
       
       |